The Challenge: "Cartoon vs. Human"
The Wellhuis marketing team was stuck. Their chatbot wasn't pulling its weight. The debate? Half the team wanted a 'friendly cartoon robot', the other half wanted a 'realistic human'. Without data, it was yet another endless meeting about opinions.

"We were arguing for weeks about a cartoon versus a photo. Brandpulse gave us the answer in 5 days. The 32% uplift proves that you shouldn't guess results."
The Test: Real behavior, not opinons
Wellhuis chose the Brandpulse Silver Package to settle the debate. Unlike traditional panels where people say what they like, Brandpulse measured what they actually did in the audience their natural viewing environment, not in focus groups.
- Variants: 5 (2 Cartoons, 2 Realistic Humans, 1 Stylized Icon).
- Targeting: Dutch homeowners across 10 major cities.
- Metric: Stopping Power Rating (SPR) & Engagement.
Validation: The test delivered 34,753 human signals (exceeding the promised 30k), achieving a 95% Confidence Level

Testing methodology
The objective: find the asset with the highest Stopping Power Rating (SPR), the proportion of people who notice and engage after an asset captures their attention.
The Winner: Realism wins
The data was decisive. While the cartoons were "fun," they didn't drive more attention and action. The "Man – Realistic" variant dominated the test.
The Outcome: Immediate ROI
Wellhuis implemented the winning visual immediately. The impact of choosing the "professional" but effective" realistic option over the "fun" cartoon was measurable in weeks:
- +32% increase in initiated chats.
- +18% increase in qualified leads.
- +11% increase in closed sales.